Entering Jeopardy’s studio

To the green room and beyond
Posted on July 15, 2016

Sony Pictures Entertainment has a contracted rate at a comfortable if nondescript hotel, and we made the wise move of arriving there two nights in advance—creating some semblance of a consistent daily rhythm is probably good before performing under pressure.1 Wandering the halls on the eve of taping triggers idle speculation as to which fellow guests might also be prospective competitors, although it’s unclear what in comportment or style would mark them out as such. But the next morning when I head to the lobby to catch the shuttle the contestants are unmistakable, for two reasons:

  1. Everyone has the two2 requisite changes of clothes draped on an arm or over a shoulder, like we’re about to go to a very formal sleepover3
  2. No one else would be standing in a lobby of a hotel in a rough circle nearly motionless and silent at seven in the morning

Read more…

  1. Given the circumstances this was also the first flight for our newborn son, which added exponentially to the logistical complexities of the trip. Plus guests under eight are barred from the set, requiring someone to stay back with him. But it was definitely worth it, because love.
  2. You are of course welcome to bring more than two outfits, depending on your level of optimism, though if you’re lugging a Samsonite and the combined number of Jeopardy wins in your ancestry is under 20 you should probably dial it back a bit there, tiger.
  3. There are no other life situations I can think of where outfits are selected and transported with such careful consideration and the simultaneous knowledge that there is a two-thirds chance they will be put back unworn.
  4. Even the robot battle shows that were briefly popular thrived on the competition between the teams themselves, which the mechanical destruction merely foregrounded. Drama, an essential component of television, is ineffably human.
  5. You’ll note a rather expensive German luxury car in a prime parking spot right next to the studio. Look closer and you’ll see that the license plate is BONUS RD. I would hardly think that Pat Sajak or Vanna White would want to draw such attention to themselves given their existing levels of celebrity, so it could be a producer’s vehicle. Regardless, further evidence of the handsome profitability of game shows.
  6. And the amorphous hopes of thousands trying to catch their big break in Hollywood.
  7. His dressing room is somewhere in the back regions of the set, comfortably insulated from any chance contact with contestants. It is presumably furnished with accoutrements unknown to the contestants’ side of the house.
  8. Or the Canadian equivalent: after a temporary hiatus Canadians are once again eligible to compete. Questions over anti-spam laws had caused producers to cut off Canadian contestants for fear of lawsuits. 
  9. It’s that shirtless one of Alex, of unknown provenance.
  10. And having my eyebrows filled in made me aware that my eyebrows could use a filling-in.
  11. Our taping occurring shortly after Prince died, and I later found out that at least one of these songs was a very famous one. This did not bode well for my performance in any potential music categories.

Getting ready to play Jeopardy!

The calm before the slightly less calm
Posted on July 7, 2016

A casual observer would be surprised to discover the legal rigor that accompanies an appearance on American game shows. The legacy of the quiz show scandals of the 1950s is still very much with us, and the first thing a contestant coordinator will do upon calling is run through a litany of possible relationships to uncover anything potentially disqualifying.1 For the vast majority of contestants these questions will be perfunctory, so unless you’ve been regularly serving blintzes to Alex Trebek at his favorite diner you should be in the clear.2

Throughout the phone conversation you will maintain your detachment and professional calm, although you both know full well where this is going, so that the actual invitation to appear that follows your satisfactory responses is simultaneously thrilling and anticlimactic.

Jeopardy gives you roughly six weeks between the call and your actual tape day, and there is little flexibility in that schedule, if you wished for a few more months of preparation. Contrary to general belief there is also zero guidance as to areas of study nor any preparatory material, so contestants must watch the show and avail themselves of the same publicly available data as anyone else.3 Read more…

  1. In the release documentation contestants must affirm that they will have nothing to do with “payola”, as apparently it is still 1927.
  2. The process attempts to weed out those with relationships with any of the parties involved in producing Jeopardy, which are numerous, and to eliminate anyone whose interest in the show could be self-serving, i.e., candidates for political office.
  3. The ur-site for all things Jeopardy is the J-Archive, which catalogs the content and performances of essentially every Jeopardy game played, in impressive and obsessive detail.
  4. Good luck trying to find Jeopardy via streaming services. Like other syndicated shows, it can’t be found legally online.
  5. For instance, the actual clue “Millard was born in this state’s Finger Lakes region in 1800” requires no knowledge whatsoever of the president himself to respond correctly. Many clues are written in this way, which is why the category is often only a rough guide to its clues’ subject matter.
  6. To be fair they could also ask about Liliʻuokalani, but given the potential for gnarly pronunciation the chances are vanishingly small, because television.
  7. I can’t tell you where we stayed, but there were two trees involved. (With credit to the late Mitch Hedberg)
  8. Other questions ask about your personal interests and professional life, sifting your life in remarkable detail in search of any nuggets that would interest the general public.

What it’s like to try out for Jeopardy!

The answer is the question
Posted on June 30, 2016

If you’re like most Americans Jeopardy! is a longstanding resident of that sliver of your cultural consciousness reserved for game shows, sharing space with Wheel of Fortune and The Price is Right, and maybe a later innovation like Who Wants to Be a Millionaire, if you happened to catch its blaze of glory in the early oughts.1 Depending on your affinity for the quiz format and the vagaries of local syndication schedules, your childhood memories might even be tinged with the electric blue glow of Jeopardy’s set.2

From elementary through high school I was a regular viewer, even becoming sufficiently invested to try entering the annual Teen Tournament, wherein high schoolers get their turn behind the iconic podiums, like Little Leaguers playing their championship game in the big league ballpark. In that pre-Snapchat era the application process required sending in a postcard and waiting for an inscrutable process to spit out a lucky fifteen students.3 Like the overwhelming majority of entrants I heard nothing afterwards, and that was that. Read more…

  1. I’ve dispensed with the signature exclamation point after Jeopardy. It may transgress the style guide but it makes it seem like we’re shouting, and Jeopardy is actually a supremely calm environment.
  2. Though for pure nostalgic appeal nothing will beat The Price is Right, whose defiantly retro set seems like a dare to a set designer that’s now gone too far for anyone to back down with dignity.
  3. So basically the Hunger Games reaping, but for mid-1990s kids who were really into school. Also possibly less cutthroat.
  4. Crew chatter during my taping suggested the most recent number was roughly 70,000 applicants, down from 100,000 or so, for reasons unknown.
  5. This applies to Jeopardy, and also most other scenarios in life where you’re presenting yourself in consideration for something.
  6. In reality the median age of a Jeopardy viewer is well into AARP territory at 64, despite attempts to be down with the kids.

Defensive insurance

Posted on June 20, 2016

not in my house

Possible corporate pitchman

Posted on June 16, 2016

in-good-hands

More of the same

Posted on June 15, 2016

a stitch in time

Ambiguous corporate slogans

Posted on June 10, 2016

protect-this-house

Answering singers’ questions

Taking it literally
Posted on May 17, 2016

War. What is it good for? – Edwin Starr

Dear Mr. Starr,

War is often a mechanism for settling territorial disputes, and sometimes a channel for imperial ambitions. Adherents of just war theory have also identified several instances where a war may lead to beneficial outcomes that outweigh its costs, for instance to counter the further expansion of a dictatorial power or to restore rights that have been taken from a population.

How do I live without you? – LeAnn Rimes

Dear Ms. Rimes,

Aside from the neonate, a person is fully capable of maintaining homeostasis independently of another human being. The basic processes necessary to sustain life can be carried out effectively by any healthy adult with normal biological functioning. Adequate intakes of oxygen, food, and water in a suitable environment can ensure the continuation of life. Read more…

Keeping it real

Posted on September 2, 2015

rebranding

Watching Kutty Pattalam for the first time

Posted on August 6, 2015

Kutty Pattalam is a Malayalam television show whose name roughly translates to “Kiddie Army”. It’s a fairly straightforward lifting of the “Kids Say the Darndest Things” concept, where kids are seated on elevated mini-thrones in front of studio audiences and prodded with leading questions until unintentional humor ensues. Consider the following a live blog of the show, only without the “live” part (and also a tenuous connection at best to “blog”.)

Five minutes in: I have a passing familiarity with Malayalam, and I am understanding approximately zero percent of what is being said right now.

The prodigious use of sound effects makes it seem like someone is playing a degraded version of Super Mario Brothers on a circa-1986 Nintendo connected to high-end Danish speakers. The overall sensation is one of disorientation, as if the sensory overload is designed to induce shock and/or seizures.

Much of the humor appears to be at the expense of parents and/or family members, who from their expressions appear to be taking it all in stride. They knew what they were signing up for.

Side note: the jump cuts are staggering. I think I have vertigo. Read more…